GMAT作文的范文:国家和艺术的关系
【www.yin56.com--夫妻相处的艺术】
Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
gmat作文模板 gmat作文七宗罪 gmat作文题库 gmat作文字数 gmatir和作文 gmat作文复议 gmat写作范文 个人与国家的关系作文 gmat作文精讲 关于艺术的作文 身边的艺术作文 gmat分析性写作范文 gmat写作题库及范文 国家艺术基金会 gmat作文题目 gmat写作六分范文 最艺术的国家
上一篇：艺术家老师描写老师的作文范文
下一篇：我喜欢的一位艺术家李斯特作文
